Dec 18, 2025, Posted by: Ronan Caverly

Asset Forfeiture for Crypto Violations in Nepal: What You Need to Know in 2025

In Nepal, owning or using cryptocurrency isn’t just risky-it’s a crime. As of 2025, the government still treats Bitcoin, Ethereum, and all other digital currencies as illegal. If you’re caught trading, mining, or even holding crypto, the authorities can seize your assets. This isn’t a warning. It’s enforcement. And it’s happening right now.

Why Nepal Banned Crypto Completely

Nepal doesn’t just discourage cryptocurrency-it outlaws it. The Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB), the country’s central bank, has made it clear: digital currencies have no legal status. They’re not money. They’re not assets. They’re not protected. And using them breaks the law.

The government’s reasoning is straightforward. Cryptocurrencies operate outside the banking system. No central authority tracks them. No regulator controls them. That means no one can stop money laundering, tax evasion, or fraud. The Nepalese Rupee (NPR) is the only legal tender, and the state won’t let digital coins threaten its control over the economy.

In 2021, the Nepal Telecommunication Authority blocked over 200 crypto exchange and mining websites. Since then, no new platforms have been allowed to operate. Even peer-to-peer trading apps are monitored. If you’re using one, you’re breaking the law.

What the Law Says: Muluki Criminal Code Act 2017

The legal backbone of Nepal’s crypto ban is Section 262(A) of the Muluki Criminal Code Act 2017. It defines cryptocurrency as any digital token, code, or information created through cryptography that holds value or can be used commercially. That covers everything-Bitcoin, Dogecoin, NFTs, stablecoins, even decentralized finance (DeFi) tokens.

Under this law, any activity involving crypto-buying, selling, mining, storing, transferring-is a criminal offense. It’s not a civil fine. It’s a criminal charge. And criminal charges mean more than just penalties. They mean asset forfeiture.

How Asset Forfeiture Works in Crypto Cases

Nepal doesn’t have a separate law for seizing crypto assets. Instead, it uses its existing anti-money laundering (AML) and financial crime laws. If you’re investigated for crypto-related activity, authorities can freeze your bank accounts, seize cash, lock your devices, and take any digital wallets linked to your identity.

In practice, this means:

  • If police find a crypto wallet on your phone or laptop during a raid, they can confiscate the device.
  • If you transferred crypto to a local exchange account, that account can be frozen.
  • If you used cash to buy crypto, the cash can be seized as proceeds of illegal activity.
  • If you mined crypto using electricity, your power usage can be investigated as part of the case.
There are no public records of how many crypto assets have been forfeited. But that doesn’t mean it’s rare. Local enforcement agencies have quietly confiscated devices and funds from dozens of individuals since 2021. Most cases are never reported. People settle quietly to avoid jail time.

Shadowy figure before a bank vault with crypto wallets fading into static.

Real Consequences: Fines, Jail, and Lost Assets

The penalties aren’t theoretical. In 2023, a man in Kathmandu was arrested after police found $12,000 worth of Bitcoin on his phone. He was charged under the AML law. His phone, laptop, and bank account were seized. He paid a fine of 500,000 NPR (about $3,700) and received a six-month suspended sentence.

Another case involved a group of students who mined Ethereum using university power. Authorities traced the energy usage, identified the miners, and shut down their operation. All mining rigs were confiscated. The students faced criminal charges and were barred from using university internet for a year.

These aren’t isolated incidents. They’re examples of how the system works. The government doesn’t need to prove you made money from crypto. Just possessing it or using it is enough to trigger enforcement.

What Happens to Seized Crypto?

No one knows for sure. Nepal doesn’t have a legal mechanism to hold or sell seized cryptocurrency. Banks can’t touch it. Exchanges are banned. So what do they do?

Based on how other countries handle similar cases, here’s what likely happens:

  • Seized crypto is stored on secure offline wallets managed by law enforcement.
  • It’s never sold or converted to NPR-doing so would imply it has value, which contradicts the ban.
  • After legal proceedings, the crypto is likely destroyed or held indefinitely.
This creates a strange situation. The government says crypto has no value. But it spends resources to secure it. That’s because they know it’s valuable-and they don’t want it circulating again.

How This Compares to Other Countries

Nepal is one of only 12% of emerging markets that still ban crypto outright. Most countries-India, Brazil, South Africa, even Indonesia-have moved toward regulation. They tax it. They license exchanges. They track users.

Nepal hasn’t. It’s chosen total prohibition. That’s unusual. And it’s becoming more isolated. The NRB hasn’t signaled any shift in policy. No consultations. No pilot programs. Just silence.

This makes Nepal an outlier. While other nations try to control crypto, Nepal tries to erase it.

Green blockchain nodes for legal uses vs red Xs over banned crypto tokens.

What Should You Do If You’re in Nepal?

If you’re living in Nepal and you own crypto, your options are limited:

  • Don’t trade. Don’t mine. Don’t hold. Even storing it on a hardware wallet is risky if authorities find it.
  • Don’t use local banks to convert crypto to NPR. That’s a red flag.
  • Don’t talk about it online. Social media posts have led to investigations.
  • If you already own crypto, consider transferring it out before it’s too late. But be careful-cross-border transfers can be monitored.
There’s no legal way to keep crypto in Nepal. The government doesn’t recognize it. The banks won’t touch it. The courts will punish you for it.

What About Blockchain? Is That Illegal Too?

This is a common confusion. Nepal’s ban targets cryptocurrency-not blockchain technology. The law doesn’t ban distributed ledgers, smart contracts, or decentralized systems. It bans assets that use cryptography to store value.

That means businesses can still use blockchain for supply chain tracking, land records, or medical data-if they avoid any token or coin. Some NGOs and government agencies are quietly testing these applications. But if you add a token, even for internal use, you cross the line.

Is There Any Hope for Change?

Not anytime soon. The NRB has repeatedly stated that crypto poses a threat to financial stability. The government has no interest in regulating it. It wants to eliminate it.

There are no pending bills. No public consultations. No committee reviews. The stance has been consistent since 2021-and there’s no sign it’s changing in 2025.

If you’re thinking about moving to Nepal to run a crypto business, don’t. If you’re thinking about investing in crypto here, don’t. The risk isn’t just financial. It’s legal. And the consequences are severe.

Is it legal to hold Bitcoin in Nepal?

No. Holding Bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency is illegal in Nepal under Section 262(A) of the Muluki Criminal Code Act 2017. Even storing crypto on a wallet or phone can lead to asset seizure and criminal charges.

Can the government seize my bank account if I traded crypto?

Yes. Nepalese authorities can freeze any bank account linked to crypto transactions under anti-money laundering laws. If they trace funds to a crypto purchase or sale, that account becomes part of the investigation and can be seized.

What happens to crypto that gets seized by police?

Seized cryptocurrency is stored in secure offline wallets by law enforcement. It is not sold or converted into Nepalese Rupees because that would contradict the government’s position that crypto has no legal value. Most seized crypto is either destroyed or held indefinitely after legal proceedings.

Can I use blockchain technology legally in Nepal?

Yes, but only if you don’t use tokens or coins. Blockchain for supply chain tracking, land registries, or medical records is allowed. However, if your system involves any digital asset with monetary value-even internally-it falls under the crypto ban and becomes illegal.

Are there any known cases of people going to jail for crypto in Nepal?

While most cases end in fines and asset seizures, criminal charges with potential jail time are common. In 2023, several individuals received suspended sentences after being convicted under AML laws for crypto trading. Actual prison time is rare, but always possible if the case involves large sums or repeated offenses.

Author

Ronan Caverly

Ronan Caverly

I'm a blockchain analyst and market strategist bridging crypto and equities. I research protocols, decode tokenomics, and track exchange flows to spot risk and opportunity. I invest privately and advise fintech teams on go-to-market and compliance-aware growth. I also publish weekly insights to help retail and funds navigate digital asset cycles.

Comments

SHEFFIN ANTONY

SHEFFIN ANTONY

Oh please, Nepal’s crypto ban is just a power trip wrapped in economic fear. You think they’re protecting the rupee? Nah. They’re terrified of decentralized tech because it makes their control look stupid. Meanwhile, India’s taxing crypto like a mature economy and Nepal’s out here confiscating phones like it’s 2003. The real crime? Being this late to the party.

December 19, 2025 AT 17:31
Vyas Koduvayur

Vyas Koduvayur

Let’s unpack this with some nuance. The Nepal Rastra Bank’s stance isn’t irrational-it’s a defensive posture against capital flight and untraceable financial flows. Cryptocurrencies, by design, bypass traditional KYC/AML frameworks. In a country where 60% of the population is underbanked and financial literacy is low, introducing a volatile, unregulated asset class without infrastructure is like handing out flamethrowers to toddlers. The forfeiture isn’t punitive-it’s preventive. The fact that they’re storing seized crypto offline proves they recognize its value, which ironically undermines their own narrative. It’s a paradox wrapped in bureaucracy.

December 20, 2025 AT 15:43
Lloyd Yang

Lloyd Yang

This is one of the most chilling and fascinating crypto stories I’ve read in years. Nepal’s approach isn’t just about control-it’s about identity. The rupee isn’t just currency; it’s a symbol of sovereignty. When you ban crypto, you’re saying: ‘We decide what value means here.’ And honestly? I get it. In a place where people still rely on cash for survival, letting anonymous digital tokens float around like ghosts? That’s not innovation-that’s chaos with a blockchain logo. The real tragedy isn’t the seized wallets-it’s the young coders and entrepreneurs who can’t build on this tech without risking jail. We need to stop treating crypto like a villain and start asking: what systems are we failing to protect that make places like Nepal feel they have to crush it?

December 20, 2025 AT 22:29
Jake Mepham

Jake Mepham

Big respect to Nepal for drawing a line in the sand. Most countries are trying to monetize crypto. Nepal’s saying: ‘Not on our watch.’ And you know what? Sometimes that’s the bravest move. Imagine being a policymaker in Kathmandu-seeing your neighbors lose life savings to rug pulls, watching crypto bros turn into debt slaves, knowing your central bank can’t track a single transaction. So they shut it down. Hard. No gray area. No loopholes. It’s not perfect, but it’s honest. And honestly? I’d rather live in a country that says ‘no’ clearly than one that says ‘yes’ and then taxes you into oblivion.

December 20, 2025 AT 23:30
Cathy Bounchareune

Cathy Bounchareune

Wait so if I use blockchain for land records but don’t use a token… is that legal? Like… can I build a decentralized registry for farms? That’s wild. I didn’t even know that was a thing. So it’s not the tech they hate-it’s the money part? That’s actually kinda smart. Like, you can use the tool but not the currency? Feels like they’re trying to have their cake and eat it too. But hey, if it keeps people safe from scams, I’m down.

December 22, 2025 AT 21:06
Jordan Renaud

Jordan Renaud

There’s something poetic about a country choosing to protect its people over profits. Nepal doesn’t have Wall Street lobbyists or crypto influencers. It has farmers, teachers, and students trying to get by. When the world rushes toward shiny new things, sometimes the most radical act is to say no. Not because they’re backward-but because they’re wise. The seized wallets? They’re not trophies. They’re warnings. And maybe, just maybe, we in the West need to listen before we assume everyone else is just behind.

December 24, 2025 AT 10:54
Janet Combs

Janet Combs

so like… if you have bitcoin on your phone and cops come, they just take your phone? and keep it? like… forever? that’s wild. i feel bad for the students who mined with uni power. imagine getting banned from the internet for a year because you were trying to make some cash lol. also… why are they storing it if it’s ‘worthless’? that’s so sus. 🤔

December 26, 2025 AT 05:04
Dan Dellechiaie

Dan Dellechiaie

Let’s be real-Nepal’s crypto ban is the only sane policy in a world gone mad. You think India’s ‘regulated’ crypto is better? Nah. They’re just slapping taxes on it while letting hedge funds pump and dump on retail. Nepal’s saying: ‘We don’t want your toxic gambling tokens.’ And honestly? More countries should follow. The fact that they’re holding seized crypto offline proves they know it’s valuable. That’s not hypocrisy-it’s strategy. They’re not stupid. They’re just not playing your game.

December 27, 2025 AT 13:59
roxanne nott

roxanne nott

They’re confiscating wallets but not selling the crypto? That’s not policy. That’s theater. If it’s worthless, burn it. If it’s valuable, tax it. But this half-assed ‘we don’t recognize it but we’re keeping it’ nonsense? Classic bureaucratic cowardice.

December 27, 2025 AT 14:05
Ashley Lewis

Ashley Lewis

It is regrettable that such an archaic and economically illiterate stance persists in the 21st century. The government’s refusal to adapt, coupled with its reliance on punitive asset forfeiture, reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of modern finance. One does not eradicate innovation through coercion. One merely drives it underground, where it flourishes in the shadows. This is not governance. It is fear dressed in legal robes.

December 28, 2025 AT 07:53
vaibhav pushilkar

vaibhav pushilkar

Actually, Nepal’s approach is the most responsible one. Crypto’s volatility and lack of regulation make it a disaster for developing economies. Better to ban it than let people lose everything. I’ve seen too many friends get scammed. This isn’t oppression-it’s protection.

December 30, 2025 AT 05:27
Craig Fraser

Craig Fraser

Let’s be honest: this is just another case of a weak state clinging to control because it has no other leverage. If Nepal had real institutions, it wouldn’t need to ban crypto-it could regulate it. But banning it? That’s the lazy option. And now they’re hoarding digital gold like it’s a secret stash. Pathetic.

December 30, 2025 AT 13:44
Jacob Lawrenson

Jacob Lawrenson

YOOOOO Nepal’s out here being the crypto villain and I’m here for it 😭🔥 Like imagine being the cop who seizes a phone with 5 BTC and then just… locks it in a safe forever? That’s like being the guy who finds a dragon and says ‘nah, we’re not letting it fly’ 🐉🚫 I respect the chaos. Also, who’s gonna pay for the electricity bills on those seized rigs? 😂

December 31, 2025 AT 01:03
Zavier McGuire

Zavier McGuire

the whole thing is a mess but honestly if you’re holding crypto in nepal you’re asking for trouble. no one’s forcing you to. just don’t do it. problem solved. also why are people even talking about this like it’s a human rights issue? it’s not. it’s a financial rule. live by the rules or leave

December 31, 2025 AT 15:15

Write a comment

© 2026. All rights reserved.