Dec 23, 2025, Posted by: Ronan Caverly

International Sanctions and Crypto Restrictions in Syria and Cuba in 2025

On July 1, 2025, something unexpected happened in global finance: Syria was effectively removed from the U.S. sanctions list. Not partially. Not conditionally. The entire comprehensive embargo that had been in place since 2004 was wiped clean. The Central Bank of Syria was taken off the SDN List. U.S. banks could now open accounts there. Financial services could be exported without a license. For the first time in over two decades, Syria was no longer a financial black hole.

But while Syria got a lifeline, Cuba got slammed harder than ever.

Just days after lifting sanctions on Syria, the Trump administration doubled down on Cuba with National Security Presidential Memorandum 5. It didn’t just keep the old rules - it made them stricter. U.S. companies were barred from doing business with Cuban entities, even through third countries. Non-U.S. subsidiaries of American firms were now explicitly targeted. And enforcement? It became brutal. In July 2025, a Delaware logistics company, Key Holding, LLC, paid over $600,000 just for shipping freight from Colombia to Cuba - a violation that was voluntarily disclosed. That’s not a warning. That’s a message.

What Changed in Syria?

Executive Order 14312 didn’t just tweak Syria’s status - it erased the legal foundation of the sanctions. Six executive orders dating back to 2004 were revoked. The national emergency declared after 9/11 that justified the crackdown was terminated. The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) removed every Syrian bank, company, and official from the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List - except for a few.

Who’s still banned? The Assad family. Former regime officials tied to human rights abuses. People involved in the captagon drug trade. Anyone threatening regional stability. That’s it. Everything else? Open for business.

For Syrian entrepreneurs, this meant new access to international payment systems. For diaspora communities sending money home, remittances became faster and cheaper. For crypto users, it was a game-changer. Before July 2025, Binance and other exchanges blocked Syrian users due to compliance fears. After? The blocks came down. Trading volumes spiked. Syrians could now buy Bitcoin, Ethereum, and stablecoins without needing a middleman.

But here’s the catch: Syria still has no crypto laws.

No licensing. No regulation. No clear rules on who can mine, trade, or hold digital assets. That means while access improved, legal clarity didn’t. Businesses dealing with Syrian partners now face a paradox: the U.S. says they can do business - but banks, payment processors, and fintechs still hesitate. Why? Because they’re scared of accidentally transacting with someone still on the targeted sanctions list. One wrong transfer, and your institution gets fined.

How Crypto Works in Syria Today

There’s no official crypto exchange in Syria. No central bank digital currency. No legal framework. But that doesn’t mean crypto isn’t used - it’s thriving in the shadows.

Most Syrians access crypto through peer-to-peer (P2P) platforms like LocalBitcoins and Paxful. Others use Binance P2P, which became fully operational in Syria after July 2025. USDT (Tether) is the most popular stablecoin - it’s used to buy goods, pay for services, and even salary workers in sectors like tech and construction.

Some businesses have started using Lightning Network solutions like Lightspark’s Grid Switch. It lets them receive cross-border payments in fiat through local Syrian banks, while the underlying settlement happens via Bitcoin’s Lightning Network. No crypto touches the user’s wallet - but the speed and cost savings are real.

Still, the lack of regulation creates risks. If the U.S. changes its mind again - and history says it might - those who used crypto to bypass old sanctions could be retroactively penalized. There’s no legal shield. No safe harbor. Just trust in current policy.

Blockchain transaction map with green paths to Syria and red blocked paths to Cuba, featuring OFAC audit stamps and warning signs.

Cuba: The Opposite Outcome

If Syria was freed, Cuba was locked tighter.

The Cuba Assets Control Regulations (CACR) were never repealed. They were reinforced. NSPM-5 made it clear: even indirect involvement with Cuba is dangerous. A U.S. company can’t ship goods to Cuba through a Mexican warehouse. A German firm can’t provide cloud services to a Cuban startup if a U.S. citizen owns part of it. The rules are extra-territorial - and they’re enforced.

Key Holding’s $608,825 fine wasn’t an outlier. It was a template. OFAC is now auditing every shipment, every software license, every cloud contract that touches Cuba. The message is simple: if you’re American or have American ties, don’t even think about it.

And crypto? It’s not just restricted - it’s treated as a high-risk tool for evasion.

U.S. exchanges like Coinbase and Kraken still block Cuban users. Even if someone in Havana buys crypto on a non-U.S. exchange, transferring it to a wallet linked to a Cuban IP address triggers compliance alerts. Some Cubans use VPNs and offshore wallets - but that’s risky. OFAC has already tracked crypto transactions linked to Cuban military entities. In 2025, they froze a wallet that received $2.3 million in Bitcoin from a Russian exchange, traced back to a Cuban defense contractor.

For ordinary Cubans, crypto is less about freedom and more about survival. Remittances from the U.S. are nearly impossible. So they rely on friends abroad to buy gift cards, send them via Telegram, and cash them out through black-market traders. It’s messy. It’s slow. But it works.

Why the Double Standard?

Why lift sanctions on Syria but tighten them on Cuba?

The answer isn’t about human rights - it’s about geopolitics.

President Trump’s team framed Syria’s sanctions relief as a reward for cooperation. In early 2025, the Syrian government, under President Ahmed al-Sharaa, dissolved the former rebel group Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), which the U.S. had labeled a terrorist organization. They handed over intelligence on Iranian-backed militias. They allowed U.S. diplomats back into Damascus. In return, they got economic access.

Cuba? No such deal. The Cuban government refused to negotiate on political prisoners. It kept its military ties with Russia and Iran. It didn’t change its stance on dissent. So the U.S. didn’t budge. In fact, it punished even symbolic gestures - like a Cuban tech startup offering free coding classes to Venezuelan refugees. OFAC called it “material support.”

This isn’t about democracy or freedom. It’s about leverage. Syria was a bargaining chip. Cuba was a symbol.

U.S. financial dashboard displaying Syria's sanctions lifted and Cuba under intensified alerts with fine amounts and blocked services.

What This Means for Crypto Users

If you’re in Syria: you can now use crypto more freely than ever. But you’re still operating in a legal gray zone. Don’t assume protection. Don’t trust banks. Use P2P. Use stablecoins. Keep records. Assume the rules can change again tomorrow.

If you’re in Cuba: crypto is still a high-risk lifeline. Avoid U.S. platforms. Don’t link your wallet to any U.S.-based exchange. Use non-custodial wallets. Use privacy tools like Tor. But understand: if you’re caught, you won’t get a warning. You’ll get a freeze.

If you’re a business or fintech: Syria is open for service providers - if you do your due diligence. Screen every counterparty against the remaining targeted sanctions list. Use tools like Chainalysis or Elliptic to monitor transactions. Don’t rely on “Syria is open” as a blanket green light.

Cuba? Don’t even try. The risk isn’t worth the reward. OFAC doesn’t negotiate. They fine. And they’re watching.

The Bigger Picture

This isn’t just about Syria and Cuba. It’s about how the U.S. uses sanctions as a living, breathing weapon.

Iran? Still under maximum pressure. Russia? Sanctions expanded again in June 2025. Venezuela? Still blocked. China? New rules targeting AI chips and crypto mining equipment exports.

And crypto? It’s becoming the frontline. Not because it’s illegal - but because it’s hard to control. Governments can’t shut down a wallet. They can’t block a decentralized exchange. So they’re forcing exchanges to become enforcers. They’re pressuring banks to cut off anyone who touches sanctioned countries - even if the transaction is legal.

The result? A world where access to money depends on where you live - and who your government is friends with.

For Syrians, 2025 brought a rare chance to rebuild. For Cubans, it brought deeper isolation. And for crypto? It proved it’s not a tool of liberation - it’s a tool of power. Whoever controls the rules controls the flow.

Can I still use Binance in Syria after the sanctions were lifted?

Yes. After July 1, 2025, Binance lifted all restrictions on Syrian users. You can now trade, deposit, and withdraw without needing special permission. However, you must still avoid transacting with individuals or entities on OFAC’s targeted sanctions list - like members of the Assad family or captagon traffickers. Binance still performs automated screening, so unusual activity may trigger a review.

Is cryptocurrency legal in Cuba?

Cuba doesn’t have a law banning cryptocurrency, but U.S. sanctions make it nearly impossible to use legally. U.S.-based exchanges block Cuban users. International exchanges may freeze accounts linked to Cuban IPs. Any crypto transaction that involves a U.S. person, bank, or service is considered a violation of the Cuba Assets Control Regulations. While individuals still use crypto informally, doing so carries serious legal risk.

What happens if I send crypto to someone in Syria who’s on the sanctions list?

Even though broad Syria sanctions are gone, targeted sanctions still apply. If you send crypto to a sanctioned individual - like a former Assad regime official or someone tied to the captagon trade - your transaction could be flagged by blockchain analytics firms. U.S. financial institutions or crypto exchanges that process the transaction could face fines up to $1 million per violation. You could also be investigated for aiding a sanctioned person, even if you didn’t know their identity.

Can a U.S. company do business with a Cuban startup?

No. Under NSPM-5, U.S. persons - including companies, subsidiaries, and even contractors - are prohibited from engaging in any transaction involving Cuba, even indirectly. That includes cloud services, software licenses, consulting, or payment processing. The Key Holding case proves that even non-egregious violations result in six-figure penalties. There are no exceptions for small businesses or humanitarian work.

Are there any safe ways to send money to Cuba right now?

There are no safe, legal ways for U.S. citizens or companies to send money directly to Cuba. Some Cubans rely on third-country relatives to send cash via Western Union or MoneyGram through non-U.S. branches - like in Mexico or Spain. Others use gift cards or physical items mailed through unofficial channels. Crypto is risky and monitored. Any method involving U.S. infrastructure is legally dangerous. The only truly safe option is to avoid any transaction that touches U.S. systems.

Author

Ronan Caverly

Ronan Caverly

I'm a blockchain analyst and market strategist bridging crypto and equities. I research protocols, decode tokenomics, and track exchange flows to spot risk and opportunity. I invest privately and advise fintech teams on go-to-market and compliance-aware growth. I also publish weekly insights to help retail and funds navigate digital asset cycles.

Comments

Kevin Karpiak

Kevin Karpiak

This is pure geopolitical theater. Syria gets a pass because they bowed to Trump, Cuba gets crushed because they didn't. Crypto isn't freedom-it's just another sanction tool.

December 24, 2025 AT 17:54
Helen Pieracacos

Helen Pieracacos

So let me get this straight-Syria’s now a financial paradise but Cuba’s still in the digital dungeon? Oh right, because democracy.

December 24, 2025 AT 22:33
Sophia Wade

Sophia Wade

The real tragedy isn't the sanctions-it's that we've reduced human dignity to a bargaining chip in a game of geopolitical poker. Crypto didn't liberate anyone. It just made the power structure more efficient.

December 26, 2025 AT 17:43
Naman Modi

Naman Modi

Syria’s crypto boom? More like a trap. One day they’re open, next day OFAC drops another ‘oops we missed this guy’ update. People are gonna get burned.

December 28, 2025 AT 17:41
Vyas Koduvayur

Vyas Koduvayur

Let’s be real-this isn’t about policy, it’s about optics. Syria’s regime gave up HTS to look like they’re ‘cooperating’-which means they sold out their own people to get back in the game. Cuba? They’re the stubborn old man who won’t say please. So OFAC makes them bleed. Crypto? Just the new wire transfer. No magic. No revolution. Just more bureaucracy with blockchain labels.

December 29, 2025 AT 16:32
chris yusunas

chris yusunas

Cubans using Telegram gift cards like it’s a secret society? That’s next-level hustle. Meanwhile Syrians are trading USDT like it’s cash at a market stall. Same tech. Different worlds. One’s surviving. The other’s rebuilding. Both are just trying not to starve.

December 29, 2025 AT 23:46
Zavier McGuire

Zavier McGuire

Why are we even talking about this like it’s fair? It’s not. It’s power. And whoever controls the wallet controls the people. End of story

December 31, 2025 AT 07:58
vaibhav pushilkar

vaibhav pushilkar

If you’re in Syria and using Binance P2P, always double-check the counterparty’s name against OFAC’s limited list. Don’t assume ‘Syria is open’ means ‘everyone is safe’. One wrong transfer and your wallet gets tagged. Been there.

December 31, 2025 AT 14:51
Jacob Lawrenson

Jacob Lawrenson

This is why crypto needs decentralization. Not because it’s cool. Because when governments play favorites, the people need a way out. Syria’s lucky. Cuba’s not. But the tech? It’s still alive. Keep using it.

December 31, 2025 AT 18:33
Dustin Bright

Dustin Bright

imagine being a syrian entrepreneur who finally got access to the global market... only to realize your bank still won’t touch you because they’re scared of a 15-year-old sanction list that nobody updated 🤡

January 2, 2026 AT 11:37
Megan O'Brien

Megan O'Brien

The jargon here is thick enough to choke a goat. ‘Extra-territorial enforcement.’ ‘Non-custodial wallets.’ ‘Material support.’ Can we just say ‘if you’re American and you help Cuba, you’re screwed’? Simpler. Clearer. More honest.

January 3, 2026 AT 03:32
SHEFFIN ANTONY

SHEFFIN ANTONY

You think this is bad? Wait till China starts using crypto sanctions against Taiwan. Then you’ll see what real financial warfare looks like. This? This is just the warm-up round.

January 4, 2026 AT 05:01
Lloyd Yang

Lloyd Yang

I’ve worked with Syrian freelancers since 2020. They used to send me screenshots of failed bank transfers. Now they send me invoices in USDT. No delays. No fees. No middlemen. It’s not perfect-but it’s the first time in 20 years they’ve had a real shot. Don’t dismiss that. Even if the rules are shaky, the people are building something.

January 4, 2026 AT 10:22
Craig Fraser

Craig Fraser

The hypocrisy is staggering. Syria’s regime is still brutal. Cuba’s is still authoritarian. But one gets a gold star and the other gets a prison sentence. This isn’t policy. It’s tribalism dressed up as foreign affairs.

January 6, 2026 AT 06:27
Amit Kumar

Amit Kumar

Bro, let me tell you something from India-we’ve seen this movie before. Sanctions on Iran, on North Korea, on Venezuela. The U.S. says it’s about human rights. But when the money flows, it’s always about leverage. Syria gave up a terrorist group. Cuba didn’t kiss the ring. So now Cubans are stuck with gift cards and Telegram traders while Syrians get Binance. It’s not justice. It’s transactional politics with a side of crypto.

January 6, 2026 AT 18:41
Brian Martitsch

Brian Martitsch

If you’re using crypto in Cuba, you’re not a freedom fighter-you’re a regulatory liability. And if you think you’re clever with Tor and offshore wallets, you’re just another statistic waiting for OFAC to ping your IP. Wake up.

January 8, 2026 AT 02:30
Rebecca F

Rebecca F

This whole thing is a moral catastrophe wrapped in a spreadsheet. People are starving in Cuba because some bureaucrat in Washington decided they’re not worth negotiating with. Meanwhile Syrians are buying Bitcoin like it’s bread. This isn’t foreign policy. It’s cruelty with a PowerPoint.

January 8, 2026 AT 10:40
Ashley Lewis

Ashley Lewis

The legal architecture of U.S. sanctions has become a self-perpetuating machine. It no longer serves policy-it serves compliance departments. The removal of Syria’s sanctions was not an act of justice. It was a corporate risk assessment. The tightening on Cuba? A signal to Wall Street that geopolitical loyalty is still the only currency that matters.

January 9, 2026 AT 23:25

Write a comment

© 2026. All rights reserved.